In February 2021, I shared my concern on twitter about the complexities of the mRNA technology. I also wrote a detailed article on my website about other concerns about the technology. Yet, in 2023 the scientists who invented the technology were rewarded with the Nobel Prize in Medicine for replacing an RNA base, uridine, with a synthetic analog, with the wishful "hubristic" hope that the foreign mRNA (as in mRNA vaccines) bypasses/fools the human immune system, not rejected, and transcribed inside our cells with full fidelity. This would have many implications for the future as scientists (i.e., their corporate or government sponsors) could bypass God and nature to manipulate/control our cellular factories into making on-demand custom-ordered proteins.
As usual, the overconfident (tunnel-visioned) scientists were proven wrong by trying to outsmart our intelligent/evolutionary design. In December 2023, a devastating discovery was made by researchers at the University of Cambridge’s Medical Research Council (MRC) Toxicology Unit that the protein-making machine in the body actually realizes there is something wrong with the synthetic uridine analog in the mRNA shots, so the incorporation of N1-methylpseudouridine in the new vaccines results in ribosomal frameshifting. A separate paper in January 2024 by biomathematician Jean-Claude Perez confirmed this finding. What does frameshifting mean?
Science today is mostly a profitable and sponsored business. Be wise. Don’t sell your attention to “attention merchants.” Get your information by supporting “independent” (non-corporate) scientists (like me) who share uncensored, unsponsored science and useful, simplified insight. I am guided just by my God-given conscience, not by mobs, politics, profits or corporations. By honoring me as a subscriber, you will receive my articles, parts of my book and ability to be in my network (for questions and answers):
The authors of the British paper (Mulroney et al.) indicate "The frameshifted products could activate T cells that target host cells [meaning our own cells] and ... increase production of new B cell antigens." In other words, as the late Luc Montagnier (also a Nobel laureate of the old honorable kind) predicted, the shots could trigger AIDS-like auto immune diseases, or cause flare ups in people with existing autoimmune diseases.
An Australian paper published earlier in August confirmed similar possibilities of immunologic harm in children with more naive (untrained) immune systems: “vaccination in children alters cytokine responses to heterologous stimulants, particularly one month after vaccination…There were sustained decreases in cytokine responses to viral, but not bacterial, stimulants six months after BNT162b2 [Pfizer] vaccination.”
Another paper by British scientists confirms similar irregularities in the immune systems of the elderly vaccinated populations.
Reviewing such data, another group of scientists have wondered "If Mulroney et al. were able to predict the existence of frameshifted proteins, why were Pfizer’s scientists unable to do so? The same question may be asked of regulators, especially in light of unresolved discrepancies and the specific obligation imposed by the European Medical Agency on BioNTech regarding the identities of the observed Western Blot (WB) bands obtained by in vitro expression assays...The full sequence of these proteins should be provided. Further, the homologies between the proposed frameshifted proteins and peptides and known proteins must be conducted using databases and tools such as BLAST.”
Now the scientists who discovered the frameshifting, instead of just seriously questioning the sanity of the mRNA technology, are trying to overcome its problems by identifying “ribosome frameshift sites or sequences, to alter the mRNA sequence to reduce such effects.” In either words, they want to unstitch an already poorly stitched sequence. A wise scientist would ask “Is it even wise to use such stitches?” Only if we were as wise as Mary Shelley in 1818 who wrote about the story of Victor Frankenstein, a young delusional scientist who tried to "stitch up" a perfectly healthy human!